In the ongoing presidential election ruling, Atiku Abubakar sought to present fresh evidence against President Bola Tinubu, but the Supreme Court rejected his request.
As a lighthearted joke, the Supreme Court rejected Atiku’s plea, ruling that it could not be accepted.
The complaint was filed after the deadline and was unable to provide evidence of the forgery’s purpose, the Supreme Court claimed.
In order to present fresh proof of forgery against Tinubu, Atiku has requested permission from the Supreme Court.
He begged the court to investigate the case because of its constitutional and democratic consequences.
Tinubu’s academic records, which were given over to him by Chicago State University (CSU) on October 2, were the new proof Atiku intended to provide.
The former Vice President notified the court that the new evidence was critical to his appeal and that the court had inherent authority to hear and rule on the motion.
However, the Supreme Court stated that it lacked the authority to hear new evidence because the constitutional time limit had passed.
Leave a reply